As such, multiple factors can be incorporated into classrooms to achieve positive behavior from students and teachers when it comes to difficulties in overcoming certain obstacles in education. Although it may not be suitable for many classrooms that have more competitive and standardized notions of progress, this methodology works well for students that are prepared to reach their goals and their desired pace. The Khan Academy method for monitoring student progress has a substantial number of advantages and disadvantages. However, students that do not reach certain general norms could still be making progress according to personal goals. Additionally, without taking the set goals into consideration, a division would be drawn between students who are presumed deficient and those that are surpassing educational standards. Each student would have a unique goal and a planned route towards it, it would be difficult to compare students with each other. For instance, it makes comparing progress or methodology between students difficult (Ormrod, 2019). Furthermore, the response, which in this case is the student’s progress, and the stimuli, the provided educational program, is clearly defined and easy to analyze.įrom the standpoint of social cognitive theory, this technique has some disadvantages. The personally-set goals allow for students to perform well within their abilities and encourage positive attitudes towards learning.

This method allows for measurable behavior and factors that influence the student’s educational trajectory.

From the perspective of a behaviorist, this methodology encourages progressive learning through the interaction of the student’s behavior and their environment (Ormrod, 2019).

Khan academy common core